The ceiling has held in every year since 2003 except 2020 and 2021, when a 2020 law had lifted it. Debt still rose from 23 percent of GDP in 2012 to 41 percent in 2025, and this year's budget sets aside 19 rupiah of every 100 it plans to collect for interest.
Indonesia's state may not run a budget deficit above 3 percent of GDP, or let its borrowing pass 60 percent. Both limits sit in the explanatory notes to Law 17 of 2003 on State Finance. They are Europe's numbers. The 1992 Maastricht protocol on excessive deficits sets the same two "reference values" for EU members. In 2019 Indonesia's Fiscal Policy Agency, part of the finance ministry, wrote that the limits "adopt" the Maastricht Treaty. Nothing obliges Indonesia to use them. It chose to.
What happened. The 2003 law, passed by the House of Representatives and in force from 5 April 2003, replaced parts of a 1925 Dutch colonial accounting law. From then to 2019 the general government deficit never went above 2.7 percent of GDP on IMF figures. In March 2020 President Joko Widodo issued an emergency regulation, later Law 2 of 2020, letting the deficit pass 3 percent until the end of 2022. On the same IMF measure it reached 6.1 percent in 2020 and 4.4 in 2021, and the cap returned in 2023 as that law required. The central budget deficit was 2.30 percent in 2024 and 2.92 percent in 2025.
Who decided, this year. The 2026 budget law, signed by President Prabowo Subianto on 22 October 2025, planned a deficit of 2.68 percent. On 13 March, with oil climbing on war in the Middle East, Coordinating Economic Minister Airlangga Hartarto told cabinet the deficit could reach 4.06 percent in the worst case, and raised a new emergency regulation. Its timing, he said, was "a political decision" for the President. In July the finance ministry put the outlook at 2.85 percent. By September, subsidy and compensation payments had used 84.3 percent of their full-year budget. On 14 September the President replaced Finance Minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa with his deputy, Suahasil Nazara. On 13 October, after meeting World Bank Group President Ajay Banga, Suahasil said: "Our only currency is credibility," and recommitted to 3 and 60.
Test the official claim. The claim is that the ceiling keeps the budget credible and safe. On the deficit, it holds. Outside 2020 and 2021, when the law had lifted it, the line has not been crossed in two decades. As a measure of safety, it falls short. Debt rose from 23.0 percent of GDP in 2012 to 40.9 percent in 2025 without touching the 60 line. The ceiling counts debt against GDP, not against what the state collects, and Indonesia collects little: planned revenue for 2026 is about 12 percent of GDP. Interest took 14.1 percent of revenue in 2019. The 2026 budget's debt interest line, Rp599.4 trillion, is 19.0 percent of planned revenue. The ministry's own 2019 study names interest to revenue as a sign of fiscal vulnerability. The law sets no limit on it.
Who gained, who paid. Lenders receive the interest; who holds the bonds was not opened here. Taxpayers and every other programme carry it. The honest mirror: one hard number is easy for voters and markets to watch, and it has worked as a brake. A number people can recite is also a number they stop questioning.
Australia, like for like. Australia's Charter of Budget Honesty Act 1998 sets no number. It asks the government to keep debt at "prudent levels" and publish a strategy. The 2026-27 budget forecasts a Commonwealth deficit of A$31.5 billion, 1.0 percent of GDP, with balance projected in 2034-35. Counting all levels of government, the IMF puts Australia's deficit at 2.9 percent in 2025 and 3.2 percent in 2026, over Indonesia's line, with debt at 51.9 percent against 40.9. But Commonwealth interest of A$29.6 billion is 3.7 percent of receipts, which run near 26 percent of GDP. Australia does better on burden; one reason is that it collects about twice as much relative to its economy. Neither law stopped the climb. On the IMF measure, Australia's debt was 9.6 percent of GDP in 2007.
The build. A builder's rule would cap the cost, not only the borrowing: the share of every tax dollar that goes to lenders, published beside what the borrowing built.
What anyone can do: when a government quotes its deficit target, ask what share of revenue goes on interest, and whether it is rising.
Pattern so far: a European treaty number travelled to Jakarta by choice, not by order. That is copying, and here it is on the record. Shared outcomes are not shared intent.
If this was worth your time, you can leave a tip.
New essays by email: ricoholt.com/list
Rico Holt · ricoholt.com
If this was worth your time, you can leave a tip. Rico Holt runs on readers, not big tech or big media money, and the essays stay free.
Leave a tip · A$5Get the next essay and the book launch price first.
Privacy: your email gets used for one thing, sending you Rico Holt essays and book news. It's stored with Netlify, our form host. Never sold, never shared. Want off? Reply to any email and you're gone.